MMV Proceedings Database
Home
|
Show All
|
Simple Search
|
Advanced Search
Login
Quick Search:
Field:
main fields
author
title
publication
keywords
abstract
volume
contains:
1–1 of 1 record found matching your query (
RSS
):
Search & Display Options
Search within Results:
Field:
author
title
year
keywords
abstract
type
publication
abbrev_journal
volume
issue
pages
thesis
publisher
place
editor
series_title
language
area
notes
call_number
serial
contains:
Exclude matches
Display Options:
Field:
all fields
keywords & abstract
additional fields
records per page
Select All
Deselect All
<<
1
>>
List View
|
Citations
|
Details
Record
Links
Author
Pouwels, R.
;
Jochem, R.
;
Henkens, R.J.H.G.,
Title
Criteria for scientific tools for recreation planning in nature areas
Type
Year
2008
Publication
Management for Protection and Sustainable Development
Abbreviated Journal
Volume
MMV 4 - Proceedings
Issue
Pages
320-324
Keywords
MMV4, Adaptive management, integrating scientific tools, recreation planning, biodiversity
Abstract
Recreation is increasing the last decades in Northwest-Europe. Although these visitors might have a negative impact on biodiversity values, they are important for the support of biodiversity actions. Therefore a major objective for planning and managing of visitor landscapes is to avoid the negative effects of recreational use and to ensure that expectations of visitors can be afforded. Scientific knowledge and scientific tools always have and always will be important in managing recreation in visitor landscapes. However it is an illusion scientists will deliver ready-to-go answers. In this paper we will define criteria that scientific tools should meet. We will follow the arguments of Haider [1] and McCool et al. [2] that the use of knowledge and tools should be implemented in decision strategies like adaptive management and use experiences from a case study of recreation planning in the New Forest (UK). We will show that scientific tools should be flexible to adapt to local data to gain credibility and legitimacy and should be able to show which management alternative is most likely to meet recreation objectives and conservation objectives. Therefore the recreation tool has to be linked to the biodiversity tool. The scientific tools also should be useful in communication between stakeholders so they learn each other’s key processes and values and better understand the “other side of the table”. Especially because stakeholders have different views about what should or should not be considered a problem.
Call Number
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 1030
Serial
2636
Permanent link to this record
Select All
Deselect All
<<
1
>>
List View
|
Citations
|
Details
Home
CQL Search
|
Library Search
|
Show Record
|
Extract Citations
Help