| Records |
| Author |
Arnberger, A., Schneider, I.E., Cottrell, S., Ebenberger, M., Schlueter, A., Eder, R., Von Ruschkowski, E., Venette, R.C., Snyder, S., Gobster, P. |
Title  |
Visitors’ trade-offs between physical and social factors of bark beetle impacted recreational forests |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
192-194 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
This study used a stated preference approach to explore visitor perceptions of bark beetle outbreaks at two state parks in the USA and a national park in Germany. A visual discrete choice experiment (DCE) employed digitally calibrated images (Arnberger & Eder, 2011) to simulate forest stands with varying levels of bark beetle outbreaks, different management practices, and varying visitor uses. Translated and back-translated on-site surveys were conducted in summer 2014 with convenience samples of visitors at State Forest State Park (n=200) in Colorado, USA, Bemidji State Park (n=228) in Minnesota, USA, and Harz National Park in Germany (n=208). Each site has a history of bark beetle infestation with varying management approaches. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3919 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Pickering, C., Barros, A., Dario Rossi, S., Hernando, A. |
| Title |
What have we learned in the past 12 years about Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas? Current knowledge and future research directions. |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
183-186 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
Visitation to recreational and protected areas continues to increase and diversify. This creates both challenges and opportunities for those who engage in these activities and for those who managethe destinations. With increased visitation there can be increasing environmental impacts and potential for social conflict unless appropriately managed. Recognizing the importance of these issues a group of scholars came together in 2002 to provide opportunities for academics and practitioners to exchange information by running multidisciplinary conferences every two years on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in recreational and protected areas (MMV conferences). The first conference was in Vienna, Austria in2002 Vienna, with subsequent conferences in Rovaniemi, Finland in 2004, Rapperswil, Switzerland in 2006, Montecatini Terme, Italy in 2008, Wageningen, The Netherlands in 2010, Stockholm, Sweden in 2012,Tallinn, Estonia in 2014, and here in Novid Sad, Serbia in 2016 (Figure 1). |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3917 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Pickering, C., Leung, Y-F. |
| Title |
What’s the latest research on mountain biking in protected areas?: Results from the special issue of the Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
168-169 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
Public use of protected areas is changing, with declines in activities such as horse riding and hunting in some locations, while others such as mountain bike riding are increasing. Mountain biking riding is popular now in a wide range of protected areas from urban parks to wilderness areas and in many countries. Such popularity energizes the discourse about how mountain biking can contribute to protected area objectives, and at what cost. There is also an increasing focus on research on social and environmental aspects of mountain biking. This interest was reflected in numerous talks on the challenges of managing and monitoring mountain biking at MMV7 (Reimann et al. 2014). Inspired by this emphasis, a special issue of the Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism was set aside to showcase the latest research on mountain biking (Pickering and Leung, 2016). |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3911 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Siegrist, D. |
| Title |
Whatsalp – A hiking study on protected area tourism accross the Alps |
Type |
|
| Year |
2018 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 9 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
42-44 |
| Keywords |
MMV9 |
| Abstract |
How has the image of the Alps changed over the decades? What traces are left behind in the landscape by people and natural events? Between June and September 2017, a group of Alpine experts hiked from Vienna to Nice under the name “whatsalp”. Along their journey on foot, they examined the current state of and changes in Alpine regions, documented developments across the landscape and in society, and discussed future scenarios with local actors |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
4051 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Olafsson, R., Thorhallsdottir, G. |
| Title |
Where do the tourists in Iceland go? |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
348-350 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
Tourism remains a seasonal phenomenon and each destination experiences some kind of seasonal imbalance, financial or physical (Bigovic, 2012). Destinations can be affected by different number of peaks in seasonality and it is important to distinguish between the true seasons of the year (Butler, 2001). Knowing the number of visitors is the basic unit for measuring tourism seasonality (Lundtorp, 2001). The importance of knowing how many tourists visit destinations is well known by managers and good and accurate visitor data are valuable for planning and managing the destinations (De Cantis et al., 2015). The aim of this work is to measure where the tourists go at different times of the year.The numbers that visit the destinations will be compared with the number of tourists departing from Keflavik International Airport. Iceland is a unique destination in that Iceland is an island with practically only one access point, Keflavik International Airport (KEF), where 97% of the visitors pass through so tourist visiting the country can be quite accurately counted. The airport is in the capital area 45 minutes from the centre of Reykjavik. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3969 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Kubo, T., Mameno, K., Tsuge, T. |
| Title |
Which local policies increase revisit intention to Amami Oshima Island, Japan? Using Best–Worst scaling methodology |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
225-228 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
Recently, many studies have increasingly used and discussed the concept of revisit intentions. For example, Baker and Crompton (2000) have examined the relationship between revisit intentions and their satisfaction with travel. Chen and Gursoy (2001) have revealed the influence of past vacation experience on their revisit intentions. However, our previous studies conducted in Japanese recreational sites have shown that most tourists have expressed high revisit intentions. It seems difficult to identify which local polices increase revisit intentions of tourists using general questions (e.g., 5-point Likert scale questions). Based on the above backgrounds, the present study used Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) methodology to examine which local policies encourage tourists to revisit the destination. The advantage of BWS over general rating questions is to easily elicit relative importance of items such as policies for respondents because they choose one most and one least preferred item in each choice set. This advantage can give decision makers facing budget constraints useful information about local policy priorities for sustainable tourism. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3930 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Kajala, L.; Erkkonen, J., |
| Title |
Why count visitors? Twenty years of experiences on visitor monitoring in Finlands protected areas |
Type |
|
| Year |
2018 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 9 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
50-52 |
| Keywords |
MMV9 |
| Abstract |
This paper presents the Finnish case of visitor monitoring as implemented by Parks & Wildlife Finland (P&WF) in national parks and other protected areas. We give an overview of the entire visitor monitoring process from data collection and storage to using the data in reporting, management and decision making. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
4053 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Arnason, T. |
| Title |
Wild thoughts – exploring the meaning(s) of wilderness among Icelandic outdoor recreationists |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
294-296 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
Wilderness protection in Iceland dates back to the Nature Conservation Act of 1999 (Johannsdottir, 2016). However, to date no areas in Iceland have been formally protected as wilderness per se, partly because the identification of such areas has so far been very rudimentary. Wilderness areas in Iceland have thus up until now mainly enjoyed protection if present within the boundaries of national parks or other protected areas, in particular withinVatnajokull National Park which covers an area of 13,500 km2,, mostly in the Central Highland. According to the working criteria adopted by government agencies, the largest potential wilderness areas in Iceland are located in the Central Highland, an uninhabited region in the middle of the island which covers roughly 40.000 km2 or 40% of its total land area. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3951 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Garms, M.; Mayer, M. |
| Title |
Wilderness in German national parks: the gap between rhetoric and reality |
Type |
|
| Year |
2018 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 9 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
372-374 |
| Keywords |
MMV9 |
| Abstract |
We address the following research questions: Are German National Park able to fulfill wilderness standards of the National Biodiversity Strategy given their regional development goals? Which potential wilderness areas are left when visitor as well as management disturbances (e.g. hunting) are considered? What new challenges arise with high visitor numbers and related pressure on potential wilderness areas? |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
4165 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Folmer, A. |
| Title |
Wildlife and flora and the valuation of green places: a comparison between local and national green places in the Netherlands |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
104-107 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
In my study, wildlife and flora were defined as all species that can be encountered in the Netherlands. From another version of the Hotspotmonitor (version 1.9, in Folmer, Haartsen, Daams and Huigen, in press), it was found that locally, relatively common animal species are found attractive (e.g. Highland cattle, deer, waders, hedgehogs, ducks, frogs, dragonflies, rabbits, fish), whereas nationally, charismatic, and large wildlife are mentioned most often (e.g. wild boars, foxes, seals, and badgers). With regard to flora in local and national green places, the differences are less profound, locally, trees are mentioned most frequently, whereas nationally, heather is on first position. For both green places at local and national level, plants, flora, flowers, and more specifically orchids, are also mentioned as reason for attractiveness (Folmer et al.,in press). |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3892 |
| Permanent link to this record |
