| Records |
| Author |
Arnegger, J., |
| Title |
Protected areas, the tourist bubble and regional economic development |
Type |
|
| Year |
2012 |
Publication |
The 6th International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas: Outdoor Recreation in Change – Current Knowledge and Future Challenges |
Abbreviated Journal |
NULL |
Volume  |
MMV 6 - Proceedings |
Issue |
NULL |
Pages |
124-125 |
| Keywords |
MMV6 |
| Abstract |
NULL |
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 429 |
Serial |
2873 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Arnegger, J., |
| Title |
Economic effects of tourism in the Souss-Massa-National Park, Morocco |
Type |
|
| Year |
2010 |
Publication |
Recreation, tourism and nature in a changing world |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 5 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
238-240 |
| Keywords |
MMV5, national park, nature-based tourism, economic effects, Morocco, Souss-Massa |
| Abstract |
|
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 180 |
Serial |
2785 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Arnegger, J., Schaaff, C., Gokhelashvili, R. |
| Title |
Supporting Georgia’s Protected Areas: Linking Conservation and Local Development |
Type |
|
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 8 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
61-63 |
| Keywords |
MMV8 |
| Abstract |
According to Aichi target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, the global network of protected areas (PAs) shall be extended to cover 17% of all terrestrial areas by 2020. Internationally, progress has been achieved, with PAs now covering 12.5% of all terrestrial land. Challenges remain: Notably developing countries still lack both capacity and financial resources to adequately set up and manage PA systems, a gap that requires continuous commitment of international donors (di Minin & Toivonen, 2015). In this regard, approaches that aim to reconcile conservation and poverty reduction have been increasingly common in recent years: Between 1980 and 2008, almost three quarters of the total international aid allocated for biodiversity conservation was targeting “mixed” projects that explicitly addressed both ecological and economic objectives (Miller, 2014). This contribution presents one such project, the Support Programme for Protected Areas in Georgia (SPPA), and introduces the local context and existing challenges. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3878 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Arnegger, J.; Herz, M.; Campbell, M., |
| Title |
Media representation of nature, mass ecotourism, and the visitor experience |
Type |
|
| Year |
2021 |
Publication |
The 10th MMV Conference: Managing outdoor recreation experiences in the Anthropocene – Resources, markets, innovations |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MINA fagrapport |
Issue |
|
Pages |
122-123 |
| Keywords |
MMV10 |
| Abstract |
The soft or mass ecotourism sub-field makes up a large percentage of the ecotourism sector in many regions worldwide. This sub sector is generally characterized by larger group size, lower environmental commitment, and higher levels of service standards when compared to traditional “hard” ecotourists (Weaver, 2001).It has been argued that this popularity is driven in large part by representations of nature in popular media such as documentaries and magazines (Lemelin, 2006). Generally, any form of media may play a salient role in tourism contexts, i.e. raising expectations toward destinations, trips or tourism experiences, which may not be met in reality (Michalkó et al., 2015). Thus, while media has the potential to positively impact peoples expectations, perspectives and attitudes it also implies the danger of overpromising. Individuals with unrealistic expectations are hence more likely to experience some form of disappointment (Bramwell, 1998).These general notions can be expected to be specifically relevant in nature-based settings, in that tourists expectations may be highly influenced by curated representations of nature and wildlife. In turn, expectations are generally assumed to impact satisfaction which is a main driver for positive behavioral outcomes such as intention to re-visit and positive word-of-mouth (Faerber et al., 2021). When applied to wildlife tourism experiences we assume that the more the held image (shaped by media consumption) differs from objective reality, the greater will be both the tourists expectation and his/her disappointment.The present study examines the relationship between visitors pre-trip expectations and post-trip satisfaction of a mass ecotourism nature experience as a function of previous involvement in nature activities and organizations, and consumption of wildlife and nature-based media. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
4254 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Arnegger, J.; Eisenstein, B.; Job, H.; Woltering, M., |
| Title |
Protected area labels as brands in tourism: insights from Germany |
Type |
|
| Year |
2021 |
Publication |
The 10th MMV Conference: Managing outdoor recreation experiences in the Anthropocene – Resources, markets, innovations |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MINA fagrapport |
Issue |
|
Pages |
212-213 |
| Keywords |
MMV10 |
| Abstract |
Protected areas (PAs) are often major tourist attractions, notably in peripheral regions. Officially awarded designations, e.g. “national park”, have been described as being important brands that can create unique selling propositions (USP) for destinations, distinguishing them from similar, but unlabeled landscapes (Arnegger, 2014). The PA label is seen as a guarantee for quality and authentic nature experiences. Officially designated PAs represent a scarce resource since official (national or international) labels are not easily, if at all, transferable and imitable (Hannemann & Job, 2003). It is often argued that certain designations, especially national parks and world heritage sites, have a superior brand identity compared to other, less-known labels such as biosphere reserves or nature parks (Reinius & Fredman, 2007; Job et al., 2005; Nolte, 2004). However, this argument appears to be based to a large degree on specific case studies and on-site surveys rather than on systematic image assessments of PA categories. The present study addresses this research gap by evaluating the strengths of different PA categories as brands in tourism in a representative panel study for the German context. We focus on the three major large-scale PA categories as defined by the German Federal Law on Nature Conservation (BNatSchG): (a) national parks, (b) biosphere reserves and (c) nature parks (“Naturparke”), all of which can play, according to their legal mandate, important roles for tourism. |
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
4296 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Arnegger, J.; Dieterich, T.; Rodina,V. |
| Title |
Local awareness, acceptance and tourism development: challenges and opportunities for protected area management in Post-Soviet countries – the Samur-Yalama National Park, Azerbaijan |
Type |
|
| Year |
2014 |
Publication |
The 7th International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas: Local Community and Outdoor Recreation |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 7 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
148-150 |
| Keywords |
MMV7 |
| Abstract |
|
| Call Number |
|
Serial |
3011 |
| Permanent link to this record |
