|
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Machida, R.; Aikoh, T.; Take, M.; Matsushima, H.; Yasushi, S.; Mikami, N.; Mitarai, Y., |
|
|
Title |
Volunteer activities for semi-natural grassland conservation in Japan and the impact of COVID-19 on these activities |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2021 |
Publication |
The 10th MMV Conference: Managing outdoor recreation experiences in the Anthropocene – Resources, markets, innovations |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MINA fagrapport |
Issue |
|
Pages |
64-65 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV10 |
|
|
Abstract |
The changes in the landscape are caused by the economic and social forces of the early 19th century and particularly of the 20th century (Matej M., Frantisek P., 2013). The community of Nezasa (Pleioblastus yoshidake) and Susuki (Miscanthus sinensis) plants forming the typical semi-natural grasslands of Japan used to cover approximately 10% of the land of Japan until the 1930s. The semi-natural grasslands have been managed by local agricultural activities such as controlled burning, mowing and pasturage for over 1000 years, but recently, due to the decline in the livestock industry and the gradually aging population, the landscape management of semi-natural grasslands has become increasingly difficult. The loss of semi-natural grasslands, which have decreased to less than 3% of the national land has become a key issue. In the Second National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan, the Japanese government designated such landscape crisis as Crisis 2, which is “the degradation of Satochi-satoyama (rural landscapes formed by sustainable use of natural resources) due to insufficient level of management”.(Ministry of the Environment, 2012). But recently, due to the decline in the livestock industry and the gradually aging population, the landscape management of semi-natural grasslands has become increasingly difficult. The loss of semi-natural grasslands, which have decreased to less than 3% of the national land has become a key issue. |
|
|
Call Number |
|
Serial |
4227 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Goossen, M., |
|
|
Title |
What do people want in National Landscapes |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2008 |
Publication |
Management for Protection and Sustainable Development |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MMV 4 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
211-211 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV4, European Landscape Convention, protection, policy, Netherlands |
|
|
Abstract |
The European Landscape Convention (ELC) is the first European Treaty that is aimed specifically at the landscape. The aims of this Convention are to promote landscape protection, management and planning. A main point is that the landscape contributes to the shaping of local cultures. Landscape is a basic component of European nature and cultural heritage. Landscape contributes to the well-being of people and the strengthening of the European identity. This produces everyone rights and responsibilities for protection, management and planning of the landscape. The ELC promotes the involvement of citizens at “their” landscape and stimulates the regional and national governments in Europe to create good conditions for the development and the management of the landscape. The ELC cover all landscapes, urban or rural, nicely or ugly. On the 10th of June 2005 the Dutch minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality announced that The Netherlands will ratify the European Landscape Convention. The Dutch landscape policy has been renewed and is entirely in line with this Convention. There are 20 National Landscapes in the Netherlands, which cover approx. 25% of the surface. In the Netherlands important spatial changes are in preparation, varying from new house construction projects to catching the impact of climate change. So involvement of citizens is very important. Therefore the government was interested in the opinion of inhabitants of these National Landscapes, and what their attitude is and what their preferences are. An on-line research with 4000 respondents was carried out to give the answers. The most important result is that the inhabitants agree with the policy. Their attitude is that (economic) development must continue, but with great care of the typical characteristics of the landscape. The preferences depend on the different recreation motives, but the desire for nature development is very popular. |
|
|
Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 978 |
Serial |
2610 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Derek, M.; Kulczyk, S.; Wozniak, E.; Grzyb, T., |
|
|
Title |
Where green is greener? Multi-data approach for typology of urban green spaces |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2021 |
Publication |
The 10th MMV Conference: Managing outdoor recreation experiences in the Anthropocene – Resources, markets, innovations |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MINA fagrapport |
Issue |
|
Pages |
386-387 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV10 |
|
|
Abstract |
As the global level of urbanization is rising, with 74% of Europeans living in urban areas (United Nations, 2018), public green spaces located with-in urban and peri-urban zone remain the most accessible (and sometimes unique) option of di-rect contact with nature. Such a contact can pro-vide a variety of immaterial benefits for humans, identified as Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). Like other Ecosystem Services (ES), CES are vul-nerable to external impacts, such as urbanization processes. However, unlike other types of ES, cultural values of ecosystems or landscapes are irreplaceable: once destroyed, cannot be resti-tuted (Plieninger et al., 2013). Therefore, their proper management is the issue of a great im-portance. CES are co-production of environmen-tal features and cultural practices, what results in a constant need for new methodological solu-tions based on interdisciplinary approaches. Un-derstanding patterns of CES flow is recognized as crucial for effective landscape management and policy development (van Zanten et al., 2016).Hegetschweiler et al. (2017) found out that studies which had examined CES in urban areas tend to focus on supply or demand factors, but rarely establish links between one another. The need of further research on linkages be-tween different types of green infrastructure, a variety of forms of their use as well as on gained benefits is also underlined by OBrien et al. (2017). Such an approach requires combining natural and social data together. In this study we address this challenge. The aim of the research is to develop a typology of public green spaces (hereinafter PGS) in an urban zone, basing on the character of CES flow. As this flow can be influenced by manage-ment, it is important to propose an approach which will include a variety of data reflecting natural features of PGS as well as preferences and behaviours of its visitors. A typology of urban green areas can help in successful management especially on the urban zone level, where a more holistic and integrated approach is needed. |
|
|
Call Number |
|
Serial |
4370 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Taczanowska, K.; Brandenburg, C.; Muhar, A.; Hat-Pawlikowska, K.; Ziobrowski, S.; Chlipala, B.; Grocholski, S.; Krzeptowski, J.; Jodlowski, M; Bielański, M.; Witkowski, Z.; Balon, J.; Berbeka, K.: Biernacki, W. |
|
|
Title |
Who is hiking in the Tatra National Park, Poland? A socio-demographic portrait of visitors |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2014 |
Publication |
The 7th International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitors in Recreational and Protected Areas: Local Community and Outdoor Recreation |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MMV 7 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
27-29 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV7 |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Call Number |
|
Serial |
3113 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Andersen, O.; Gundersen, V.; Strand, O.; Panzacchi, M.; Vorkinn, M.; Fangel, K.; Van Moorter, B., |
|
|
Title |
Wild reindeer interactions with recreationists: estimating spatiotemporal habitat use and potential conflict areas in two national parks in Norway |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2010 |
Publication |
Recreation, tourism and nature in a changing world |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MMV 5 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
209-210 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV5, wild reindeer, visitor impact, monitoring, resource selection function model (RSF), conflict areas |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 256 |
Serial |
2772 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Garms, M.; Mayer, M. |
|
|
Title |
Wilderness in German national parks: the gap between rhetoric and reality |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2018 |
Publication |
Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas – ABSTRACT BOOK |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MMV 9 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
372-374 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV9 |
|
|
Abstract |
We address the following research questions: Are German National Park able to fulfill wilderness standards of the National Biodiversity Strategy given their regional development goals? Which potential wilderness areas are left when visitor as well as management disturbances (e.g. hunting) are considered? What new challenges arise with high visitor numbers and related pressure on potential wilderness areas? |
|
|
Call Number |
|
Serial |
4165 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Inge Vistad, O.; Vorkinn, M., |
|
|
Title |
Wilderness purism revisited: The value of a simplified standardised scale for monitoring purposes |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2010 |
Publication |
Recreation, tourism and nature in a changing world |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MMV 5 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
69-72 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV5, visitor monitoring, wilderness purism, standardized questions |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 74 |
Serial |
2710 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Schouten, M., |
|
|
Title |
Wildlife reserves: sanctuaries, commons or commodities? |
Type |
|
|
Year |
2010 |
Publication |
Recreation, tourism and nature in a changing world |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
|
Volume |
MMV 5 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
18-18 |
|
|
Keywords |
MMV5 |
|
|
Abstract |
Nature does not know itself as nature. We perceive it as such. And in that perception we project our images of nature. Such images are social constructs that vary in time and between cultures: nature as the enemy, nature as a resource, nature as an uncorrupted domain….. |
|
|
Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 216 |
Serial |
2686 |
|
Permanent link to this record |