| Records |
| Author |
Scherrer, P.; Smith, A.J.; Dowling, R.K., |
| Title |
Managing Visitor Impacts along Australia’s Remote Kimberley Coast – The Forgotten Dimension of Balancing Country |
Type |
|
| Year |
2006 |
Publication |
Exploring the Nature of Management |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 3 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
419-420 |
| Keywords |
MMV3, Expedition cruise, Aboriginal, visitor impacts, spiritual connection, tour operator |
| Abstract |
|
Call Number  |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 817 |
Serial |
2531 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Takahashi, M.; Yamaki, K., |
| Title |
Visitor Conflicts and their Resolution for Forest and Park Management in Jozankei National forest, Japan |
Type |
|
| Year |
2006 |
Publication |
Exploring the Nature of Management |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 3 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
423-424 |
| Keywords |
MMV3, Forest and Park management, visitor conflict, Jozankei National Forest, questionnaire survey |
| Abstract |
|
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 819 |
Serial |
2532 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Kangas, K.; Siikamäki, P.; Koivuniemi, P.; Sulkava, P.; Tolvanen, A.; Norokorpi, Y., |
| Title |
Are There Too Many Visitors in National Parks? A Campsite Analysis in Two Finnish National Parks |
Type |
|
| Year |
2006 |
Publication |
Exploring the Nature of Management |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 3 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
458-459 |
| Keywords |
MMV3, Tourism, campsite, trampling, vegetation change, national park |
| Abstract |
|
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 841 |
Serial |
2543 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Van Marwijk, R.; Taczanowska, K., |
| Title |
Types of Typologies – From Recreationists & Tourists to Artificial Agents |
Type |
|
| Year |
2006 |
Publication |
Exploring the Nature of Management |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 3 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
499-501 |
| Keywords |
MMV3, Tourist typology, artificial agents, recreation, spatial behaviour, recreational behaviour, wilderness experience, landscape preference |
| Abstract |
|
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 873 |
Serial |
2559 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Peters, K., |
| Title |
Urban public spaces: Different people, different wishes, different expectations? |
Type |
|
| Year |
2010 |
Publication |
Recreation, tourism and nature in a changing world |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 5 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
49-50 |
| Keywords |
MMV5, urban public spaces, ethnicity, meanings |
| Abstract |
|
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 92 |
Serial |
2701 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
English, D.B.K.; Zarnoch, S.J.; Bowker, J.M., |
| Title |
Trap shyness in onsite visitor surveys; evidence from the U.S |
Type |
|
| Year |
2008 |
Publication |
Management for Protection and Sustainable Development |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 4 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
135-138 |
| Keywords |
MMV4, Estimation bias, onsite surveys, recreation visitation, trap shyness |
| Abstract |
In onsite surveys of visitors, whether the purpose is estimating visitation volume or characteristics of the visit population, those who visit the area multiple times per year are candidates to be surveyed more than one time. In such surveys, each visit represents a unique sampling unit. However, individuals may be unwilling to be surveyed after the first contact. The phenomenon is similar to ‘trap shyness’ in wildlife studies wherein an animal learns to avoid traps after the initial experience. If trap shyness exists, it has the potential to bias the results for either or both visitation estimation or describing the average visit characteristics. There is some anecdotal evidence that trap shyness does exist, and could be problematic for long-term surveys such as the National Visitor Use Monitoring program used by the US Forest Service. This paper describes the conceptual framework for how trap shyness can affect both visitation estimates and visit characteristics, identify empirical hypotheses to be tested that provide evidence of trap shyness, present results for the hypotheses, and describe possible improvements to sampling processes that could determine it existence and extent. Data for the paper come from onsite surveying collected during the period October 2004 – September 2007 for about three dozen National Forests. |
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 948 |
Serial |
2595 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Petrova, E.; Aoki, Y.; Mironov, Y.; Petrova, A.; Furuya, K.; Matsushima, H.; Takayama, N., |
| Title |
Comparison of natural landscapes appreciation between Russia and Japan: methods of investigation |
Type |
|
| Year |
2008 |
Publication |
Management for Protection and Sustainable Development |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
MMV 4 - Proceedings |
Issue |
|
Pages |
198-202 |
| Keywords |
MMV4, aesthetic evaluation, appreciation of landscapes, landscape preferences in Russia and Japan |
| Abstract |
The research focusing on the aesthetic evaluation and appreciation of natural landscapes in recreational and protected areas is of great importance. While selecting landscapes for special care and protection one should take into consideration not only objective appraisal of their natural peculiarities, significance, and usefulness but also their aesthetic features. People belonging to different cultures differ by their landscape preferences due to a number of ethno-cultural factors as well as historical, social, and environmental peculiarities. The purpose of this study is to compare the landscapes appreciation in Russia and Japan, in two countries with deep-rooted traditions of landscape appreciation. The photo database of landscapes both similar and unique for Russia and Japan was made using the same methods. The respondents in both countries are suggested to classify and group photo images of different landscapes according to their personal perception as well as to estimate the attractiveness of given landscapes images. The results of the study will help us to answer: do representatives of different cultures – people in Russia and Japan – like similar landscapes due to aesthetic appreciation laws, which are common for the whole humanity, and if they don’t – then why not? |
| Call Number |
ILEN @ m.sokopp @ 974 |
Serial |
2608 |
| Permanent link to this record |
